Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, FreedomFarter said:

I don't know the history of these PFI deals well enough to confidently apportion blame. From my limited "research" (ie. googling), I think most of the deals, the worst ones at least, were done pre-Holyrood by Blair's Labour. Salmond definitely spoke out against them but I don't know what he did in terms of actions. Someone else can hopefully comment who has a proper understanding.

They were set up by spivs for spivs and supported by the likes of McConnell. It was a thoroughly dispiriting time to have an administration that didn't act as devolved because they didn't want to be devolved. To call out their own would've been existentially problematic so we got what the CEO wanted and whatever the line managers really thought we'll never know.

It's such a shame that Salmond Salmonded and his good early work is lost to vintage memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/08/2023 at 18:54, FreedomFarter said:

I don't know the history of these PFI deals well enough to confidently apportion blame. From my limited "research" (ie. googling), I think most of the deals, the worst ones at least, were done pre-Holyrood by Blair's Labour. Salmond definitely spoke out against them but I don't know what he did in terms of actions. Someone else can hopefully comment who has a proper understanding.

I remember hearing years ago that some of the PFI deals were like paying a mortgage for twenty-five years, totalling vastly more than the "price", but not owning the property at the end of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Salt n Vinegar said:

I remember hearing years ago that some of the PFI deals were like paying a mortgage for twenty-five years, totalling vastly more than the "price", but not owning the property at the end of it. 

I remember that description too and thinking any individual entering into a financial arrangement like that would have to be incredibly stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Granny Danger said:

I remember that description too and thinking any individual entering into a financial arrangement like that would have to be incredibly stupid.

Not stupid, just venal. Politicians who wanted good publicity for cutting the ribbon on new buildings, while also lining the pockets of influential friends in industry and giving absolutely zero shits about what would happen when they were out of office and unaccountable.

So, the same old story with shiny new Third Way packaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Granny Danger said:

I remember that description too and thinking any individual entering into a booth to vote for them again financial arrangement like that would have to be incredibly stupid.

ftfy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Granny Danger said:

I remember that description too and thinking any individual entering into a financial arrangement like that would have to be incredibly stupid.

Not if you were the individual or corporation who was sucking on the PFI teat.  The whole cynical point of PFI was to shuffle costs off the public finances, and whilst it did that in the first instance it kicked the problem down the road by which time the architects would have moved on to their international sinecures.

That was bad enough, but the quality of the 'products' that emerged from PFI was invariably shit, the tab for which will be picked up by Joe Public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, BTFD said:

Not stupid, just venal. Politicians who wanted good publicity for cutting the ribbon on new buildings, while also lining the pockets of influential friends in industry and giving absolutely zero shits about what would happen when they were out of office and unaccountable.

So, the same old story with shiny new Third Way packaging.

 

7 minutes ago, O'Kelly Isley III said:

Not if you were the individual or corporation who was sucking on the PFI teat.  The whole cynical point of PFI was to shuffle costs off the public finances, and whilst it did that in the first instance it kicked the problem down the road by which time the architects would have moved on to their international sinecures.

That was bad enough, but the quality of the 'products' that emerged from PFI was invariably shit, the tab for which will be picked up by Joe Public.

Either you’re not reading my post correctly or I’m not explaining myself.

My point in the analogy to buying a house is no individual would agree to pay a mortgage for 25 years in the knowledge they would not own the house at the end.  Duh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Granny Danger said:

 

Either you’re not reading my post correctly or I’m not explaining myself.

My point in the analogy to buying a house is no individual would agree to pay a mortgage for 25 years in the knowledge they would not own the house at the end.  Duh.

Your explanation was fine Granny but you overlooked an embedded and enduring aspect known simply as political expediency, in which normal rules don't apply. 

I've never known a house-buying individual whose actions were based on how it would play with the electorate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two news items today that seems to fit together

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/06/eu-unveils-package-laws-curb-power-big-tech-giants

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/sep/06/cars-collect-extensive-personal-data-on-drivers-study-warns

Whilst we all know and accept, although probably unwillingly is many instances, the fact that your phone collects a lot of data on you, I doubt very many people though that their car would be doing the same. It really is the time for Govt to stamp out this data mining by all companies, and to finally get on the side of the consumer when it comes to privacy and what data companies collect.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Soapy FFC said:

Two news items today that seems to fit together

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/06/eu-unveils-package-laws-curb-power-big-tech-giants

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/sep/06/cars-collect-extensive-personal-data-on-drivers-study-warns

Whilst we all know and accept, although probably unwillingly is many instances, the fact that your phone collects a lot of data on you, I doubt very many people though that their car would be doing the same. It really is the time for Govt to stamp out this data mining by all companies, and to finally get on the side of the consumer when it comes to privacy and what data companies collect.

 

 

Good luck with that, whatever Party is in power. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christ, the Tories are still copypasting the exact same ONLY WE CAN WIN HERE templates that Ruth Davidson knocked up a decade ago. Literally just the name and figures changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched a 9/11 documentary on iplayer earlier - Inside The President's Bunker, or a similar title. Interviews with Bush and all his advisors and the senior people involved in it at the time. There was something quite sobering that, twenty years later, George Bush was more articulate, more intelligent and more compassionate than their recent presidential efforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/09/2023 at 16:09, jakedee said:

I'm really in a quandary here.

Who to choose...🤔20230908_160600.thumb.jpg.22b668b1b0bdd3ae89df125f50f3ab87.jpg

Beginning to see a pattern..

 

image.thumb.png.29bf48bc8e1b09ffdcebe07bcf16d51f.png

Incidentally in the local elections they're referring to the Lib Dems came 3rd to Independents in 2nd.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BTFD said:

Christ, the Tories are still copypasting the exact same ONLY WE CAN WIN HERE templates that Ruth Davidson knocked up a decade ago. Literally just the name and figures changed.

We get “only the Tories can beat the SNP here” sent to us, despite the fact that I live in Edinburgh West, a fairly safe Lib Dem seat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...