Jump to content

Conference League Good Guys List


Ray Patterson

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Dev said:

The list of voters included Linlithgow Rose who didn't have a licence pre 2019 and are not members of the LL until the AGM. Is this correct? If it is then, presumably, they would not have a vote on the matter.

Also presumably the three clubs directly affected by the outcome of the vote i.e. Celtic, Hearts and Rangers, cannot vote either because they are in a conflict of interest position.

Anyone know what the official situation is?

That could reduce voting numbers down to 106. 54 votes needed to win the vote.

Doubt conflict of interest applies - league has no confirmed members as yet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snoddyisabino said:

Apologies if I’ve missed this through this thread, but what is minimum percentage of votes required for this to go through? 

Needs 55 votes out of a possible 109 among the full member clubs (92), regional FAs (10), and affiliated national associations (7).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Blootoon87 said:

Surely there's no chance of this shite going through now?

I’d say it’s extremely unlikely as I’d expect every team with any fan ownership to be a resounding no to add to the teams who’ve already declared themselves as voting no.  I honestly don’t see any appeal for most clubs to even vote yes outside of a brown paper bag incentive.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a time to be complacent because past experience with the LL has shown how the brown paper bag incentive factor can work for the powers that be but the momentum for a resounding NO is building. The key is getting a big enough majority so the SFA board finally take the hint and do not keep trying to bring this issue back to the AGM until they finally receive the answer they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dev said:

An extract from the Elgin City Chairman's UPDATE on the club web-site:

www.elgincity.net/news/latest-news/chairman-update

CHAIRMAN UPDATE

"The proposed conference league is not going to commence this upcoming season but there is a driving force from the B teams and the SFA to make it happen. There is no input from the SPFL it is the SFA, Lowland and Highland Leagues who are being affected.

I just hope we never have to be involved with it. One item that was consistent over the season was the tremendous support we received over the piece. It was not always pretty or entertaining but you all came out rain or shine to cheer us on. The Club never take that support for granted and I assure you all it is greatly appreciated

.Graham Tatters"

That was before it was clear to everyone that a vote would be required at the SFA AGM. I'm confident that Elgin City along with ICT will join Aberdeen, Ross County and Peterhead in expressing their appreciation for their Highland League brothers, and vote NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's been quite a lot of mentions for the need to restructure the pyramid and or the SPFL from SPFL clubs. Maybe something good can come out of this eventually?

1 hour ago, LongTimeLurker said:

Not a time to be complacent because past experience with the LL has shown how the brown paper bag incentive factor can work for the powers that be but the momentum for a resounding NO is building. The key is getting a big enough majority so the SFA board finally take the hint and do not keep trying to bring this issue back to the AGM until they finally receive the answer they want.

Maybe the real key is sacking the Board and getting decent straight forward people as replacements. They must exist somewhere, surely.

Edited by Dev
.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dev said:

An extract from the Elgin City Chairman's UPDATE on the club web-site:

www.elgincity.net/news/latest-news/chairman-update

CHAIRMAN UPDATE

"The proposed conference league is not going to commence this upcoming season but there is a driving force from the B teams and the SFA to make it happen. There is no input from the SPFL it is the SFA, Lowland and Highland Leagues who are being affected.

I just hope we never have to be involved with it. One item that was consistent over the season was the tremendous support we received over the piece. It was not always pretty or entertaining but you all came out rain or shine to cheer us on. The Club never take that support for granted and I assure you all it is greatly appreciated

.Graham Tatters"


I would read this as them voting in favour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dev said:

An extract from the Elgin City Chairman's UPDATE on the club web-site:

www.elgincity.net/news/latest-news/chairman-update

CHAIRMAN UPDATE

"The proposed conference league is not going to commence this upcoming season but there is a driving force from the B teams and the SFA to make it happen. There is no input from the SPFL it is the SFA, Lowland and Highland Leagues who are being affected.

I just hope we never have to be involved with it. One item that was consistent over the season was the tremendous support we received over the piece. It was not always pretty or entertaining but you all came out rain or shine to cheer us on. The Club never take that support for granted and I assure you all it is greatly appreciated

.Graham Tatters"

"There is no input from the SPFL"

None at all, apart from the only two listed officials of the proposed new 'Scottish Conference League Limited' as registered as company number SC768587 are Calum Beattie of the SPFL and Neil Doncaster of the SPFL.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, invergowrie arab said:

It will reach critical mass soon enough where even those in support or wavering don't want to be seen on the wrong side.

Maxwells position must be untenable 

 

You say that, but Doncaster had the brass neck to see out the Sevco fiasco and still cash his pay cheques at the end of the month.

Scottish football administrators do not do dignity nor credibility.

Edited by vikingTON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...