Jump to content

The New Raith Rovers Thread


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Enigma said:

We’ll be hybrid and in League One within 2/3 years, and it won’t be any of the players/managers fault.

Again, what do we do with our very limited supporter base? Is 1600 a week enough to keep us full time? For a catchment area the size of Kirkcaldy and surrounding, we get comparatively bugger all in return in terms of arses on seats week on week. Yes times are tough right now, yep, the stat of the year didn't help at all but ever since the pandemic our crowds have been getting smaller and not bigger. Hybrid and living within our means is exactly what we should be doing, we've pished good money up the wall in the last few seasons on awful return (Ross, Gullan, Goodwillie etc) when we should have been securing the future. The fact that year on year we bank on "a cup tie that will change everything" is piss poor from the top. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CountryBumpkin said:

Again, what do we do with our very limited supporter base? Is 1600 a week enough to keep us full time? For a catchment area the size of Kirkcaldy and surrounding, we get comparatively bugger all in return in terms of arses on seats week on week. Yes times are tough right now, yep, the stat of the year didn't help at all but ever since the pandemic our crowds have been getting smaller and not bigger. Hybrid and living within our means is exactly what we should be doing, we've pished good money up the wall in the last few seasons on awful return (Ross, Gullan, Goodwillie etc) when we should have been securing the future. The fact that year on year we bank on "a cup tie that will change everything" is piss poor from the top. 

1600 probably would be enough if the club was run better but if the club was well run we’d have done more over the years to attract fans/additional revenue than just sitting on our arses and hoping that a decent cup tie will bail us out.

I see we’re still trying to sell hospitality for Friday, yet clubs like Montrose can sell theirs out months in advance and they probably have more spaces to sell!

Edited by Enigma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, renton said:
Quote

To offer Rovers financial support, contact MacDonald or Sim via email addresses available on the club website.

May as well just start a fucking gofundme. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, I find this puzzling as much as anything else. John Sim is, and always has been, opaque to the point of madness, but I just can't get the whole situation to add up. 

Why spend hundreds of thousands of pounds on a pitch, floodlights, portacabins and hubs only to then plead poverty over what are essentially day-to-day running expenses? 

MacDonald mentions "maintenance that hasn't been done in previous years" (I might be misquoting slightly, but that's the gist) - which years? Presumably since 2005 (albeit almost certainly pre-dating that too) when Sim took control. Why neglect some maintenance but spend money on the floodlights? Why bother with either? If you're going to sink money on one, surely you'd do the other? 

That's the fundamental contradiction I just can't square. He's spent a fortune in the last 15+ years on various pet projects of varying natures, but seems to have also flat out refused to spend comparitively small amounts at other times. 

It feels like he's got a greater interest in the community aspect versus the first team, but then why bother supporting the club at all? He owns the ground. As someone has alluded to above, why not split them entirely? Make it some other mugs problem whether to pay rent at Stark's or try to find a ground somewhere else, and focus on running a centre for the community. Does he think the stadium needs the club as a "principal" to build the whole thing around? Then why let it get to this point? 

And it's also worth thinking about who's been setting the budgets for the last 17 years. This isn't the case that a new owner has come in and is dealing with legacy contracts and a bloated squad. If John Sim wanted to cut the playing budget by £150,000 at any point he could've done so. 

Maybe he's not pointing the finger at anyone, perhaps I'm reading that accusation into it, but it seems utterly bizarre for a man who's made a fortune in the finance world to be seeking investment in a business/project/charity/basketcase by essentially highlighting his own mismanagement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Enigma said:

1600 probably would be enough if the club was run better but if the club was well run we’d have done more over the years to attract fans/additional revenue than just sitting on our arses and hoping that a decent cup tie will bail us out.

I see we’re still trying to sell hospitality for Friday, yet clubs like Montrose can sell theirs out months in advance and they probably have more spaces to sell!

Assume best case scenario, 1600 paying £20 each a week is £32000 a home game and £608,000 a season. That doesn't pay a full time squad and backroom staff sufficiently to be any better than we would be now. Sure add in some sponsorship and competition bonuses but it's not a massive additional amount. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Brashy's Boots said:

So who is worth what? Connolly surely top of the pile.

Aidan Connolly IS the list of players worth selling and since his contract ends in May who in their right mind would pay more than a token amount to sign him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...