EdiBairn Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said: You were wrong about the consortium No, all that was given was one side of a two-sided negotiation. I'm sure the BoD would have a very different account of what went on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 No, all that was given was one side of a two-sided negotiation. I'm sure the BoD would have a very different account of what went on.So you have emailed Craig then? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Kinnear Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 I'm getting the word.........nonce [emoji23][emoji23] 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Wonder how many of our players are shiting themselves at the prospect of a transfer ban....Or how many are delighted at the stay of execution.... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinatoon Bairn Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 (edited) We should just carry on this fuckery and have our AGM in a tent planted right in the middle of the park, at least then I will be able to watch from the tree sitting just outside the stadium.. Edited December 19, 2018 by Chinatoon Bairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branch Ton Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 3 hours ago, Dunning1874 said: Considerably less time than Duncan Freemason spent making up fantasies of having insider information about SPFL tribunals. A bigger Walter Mitty figure than EdiBairn and Branch Ton put together. Get a load of you pal. You spent most of your time knicker wetting here and elsewhere and casting doubt on the club’s abilities with absolutely no clue about contract law or the the legal process . At least the Drunker Freemason was batting for his club however misguidedly. None of the spoils of victory falls to you. -4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMbairn Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 29 minutes ago, EdiBairn said: No, all that was given was one side of a two-sided negotiation. I'm sure the BoD would have a very different account of what went on. Are you actually on the board because you are blatant apologist for their actions. Just accept that they have clearly fucked up again 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 26 minutes ago, Branch Ton said: Get a load of you pal. You spent most of your time knicker wetting here and elsewhere and casting doubt on the club’s abilities with absolutely no clue about contract law or the the legal process . At least the Drunker Freemason was batting for his club however misguidedly. None of the spoils of victory falls to you. Branch, this just feels wrong. Mind you, Dunning1874 deciding he was on the side of right from the get go is hilarious. I went on what I was told from someone with a deep knowledge of the subject matter. Having spoken with that person again today, their opinion is unchanged, and reckons the “independent lawyer” has to have come up with a decision based on conjecture and lack of precedent. If that’s the case, he reckons it can be readily overturned. We shall see. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 No, all that was given was one side of a two-sided negotiation. I'm sure the BoD would have a very different account of what went on.You also said Craig didn’t have the experience or finance in place. The 2nd bit is 100% wrong. So f**k off 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colkitto Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Sum boi 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qos_75 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 5 hours ago, EdiBairn said: I hope we're consulting with a top legal team to get this resolved in our favour. If it matters to you. It matters to Digby Brown. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoon Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Falkirk’s expert legal consultant 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colkitto Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 We'll now take a very substantial compensation package thankyou. The we can pursue private litigation against all 3 snakes for breach of contract As well as a Falkirk transfer ban and 15 point deduction. Merry Christmas! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Mr X said: No, you've been wrong about lots of things. A transfer embargo, although unlikely, would be the funniest thing ever 1 hour ago, Poet of the Macabre said: This is technically true; you've been wrong about *many* things. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmfc Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 6 minutes ago, qos_75 said: If it matters to you. It matters to Digby Brown. Even Digby knows they are fecked. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
port-ton Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 I'm hearing from very creditable sources within the lawyering community that Morton have extremely favourable grounds for appealing Falkirk's appeal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Jaffo Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 I'm hearing from very creditable sources within the lawyering community that Morton have extremely favourable grounds for appealing Falkirk's appeal. What about Falkirk’s appeal to Morton’s appeal to the original appeal? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HopeStreetWalker Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Heads most roll at Board level for this. There are strict procedures in place and this matter should have been cleared by a lawyer step by step. It's basic FFS ! due diligence in such matters is the least you would expect if you are in charge of a company. Eamon Bannon got sacked for getting paperwork wrong it cost him his managerial career. The clubs future is now at stake, Fine , Transfer Embargo , Points Deduction ! perm any 1 of these 3, or we might even get a prowl of 3 the way our luck is going. Merry Xmas and where is the whisky. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunning1874 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Branch Ton said: Get a load of you pal. You spent most of your time knicker wetting here and elsewhere and casting doubt on the club’s abilities with absolutely no clue about contract law or the the legal process . At least the Drunker Freemason was batting for his club however misguidedly. None of the spoils of victory falls to you. Yes, me stating the fact that like yourself and Duncan I knew absolutely nothing about the conversations between Morton and Falkirk or the finer points of Ray McKinnon's contract was clearly a great threat to this decision taken by the SPFL that jeopardised this going in Morton's favour. Likewise, the not at all imaginary in the know posts by the two of you were definitely absolutely critical factors in their judgement that mean you should be commended. Spoils of the victory You're just another fan on a forum hoping this would go the way of your own team like the rest of us, wind your neck in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Dunning1874 said: Yes, me stating the fact that like yourself and Duncan I knew absolutely nothing about the conversations between Morton and Falkirk or the finer points of Ray McKinnon's contract was clearly a great threat to this decision taken by the SPFL that jeopardised this going in Morton's favour. Likewise, the not at all imaginary in the know posts by the two of you were definitely absolutely critical factors in their judgement that mean you should be commended. Spoils of the victory You're just another fan on a forum hoping this would go the way of your own team like the rest of us, wind your neck in. Nope. Sorry pal, please hand back your spoils immediately. They are to be distributed among other anonymous usernames on a football forum who passed badly informed comment on this issue. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.