Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bairn in Exile said:

Due to Dunfermline, QOTS and ourselves all being in League 1, and indeed a general rejigging of clubs in Scotland, is calling Leagues 1 and 2 the seaside leagues now a misnomer?

The Scottish Premiership has 4 “coastal” teams: Aberdeen, Dundee United, Hearts and Hibs.

The Championship has 7: Arbroath, Ayr United, Cove, Dundee, Inverness CT, Morten and Raith Rovers.

League 1 has 3: FC Edinburgh, Montrose and Peterhead.

League 2 has 3: Dumbarton, East Fife and Stranraer.

Should we come up with another, similarly insulting name for Leagues 1 and 2?

It depends what you define as 'seaside' I suppose 

I would add to the criteria that as well as being near the coast it also has to be a small town with a long history of no top flight football (aka in my lifetime) for the full diddy/ bucket and spade experience. The kind of place where the food kiosks consist of a single burger van and the toilets resemble portaloos. I've highlighted the teams in your post that this would apply to. 

Interestingly the Championship still has the most and League 1 has the least, after the Premiership

Edited by NavyBlueArmy1876
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, muppetshow said:

no payments were due, with the exception of the coming season and it was removed prior to any contact from the club, which was actually only initiated by us upon noticing its disappearance.  yes there's more important things to be sorted but there's been a good bit of chat on here regarding the state of the advertising contracts and payments not being made etc so felt this was relevant. i have heard that there's been a lot up for years without payment and obviously would expect them to be removed.....

Then that needs to be fixed regardless of “more important stuff” or not. It’s a reputational thing. If your board had been paid year on year, and a club employee made the decision to dismantle your advertising board without any form of consultation, then it’s up to the club to provide the new board should you have wished to continue. Simple as that.

I think we all know well enough that we now have a Board who want to do the right things for the club……that in itself is a huge shift from the last mob. Thing is, people pointing stuff out that is wrong or not working correctly should continue to do so. They are pointing legitimate  stuff out, not ripping the club to pieces.………..and importantly, they are not demanding that it be moved to the top of any list of priorities, nor are they denying the Board “a bit of slack”.

The real crap patter is them then being criticised for doing so.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Caractacus Potts
38 minutes ago, Duncan Freemason said:

Then that needs to be fixed regardless of “more important stuff” or not. It’s a reputational thing. If your board had been paid year on year, and a club employee made the decision to dismantle your advertising board without any form of consultation, then it’s up to the club to provide the new board should you have wished to continue. Simple as that.

I think we all know well enough that we now have a Board who want to do the right things for the club……that in itself is a huge shift from the last mob. Thing is, people pointing stuff out that is wrong or not working correctly should continue to do so. They are pointing legitimate  stuff out, not ripping the club to pieces.………..and importantly, they are not demanding that it be moved to the top of any list of priorities, nor are they denying the Board “a bit of slack”.

The real crap patter is them then being criticised for doing so.

 

Exactly this. 

We’re supposed to have a club that is run by fans for the fans. Too often have boards in the past tried to shout down criticism. I don’t see any indication the new board are like this however it’s not a good look if people close to them are shouting down any fair criticism on here. 

The club tweeted today that they have made the club shop hours consistent each week due to fans comments. That’s a good sign that they are listening. It’s also a completely sensible critique from those that suggested it. 

Making the fixture list available and hopefully fixing it to be accurate is another good suggestion.

It’s little things and possibly trivial but if it means people don’t turn up to a closed shop when the hours have changed for a particular day or that some fans can easily check when our next home game is, then it’s a step in the right direction to having a more effectively run club. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my iPad is now showing STs for Season 21/22. It was fine earlier in the day, so there does indeed seem to be a ghost in the machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Caractacus Potts said:

Anyone tried clicking on tickets? 

Brings up a page advertising season tickets for last year on my phone! 

Yep, that's what I get. 

I'm sure over time these things will be fixed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I note that a lot of people on twitter wetting their pants about having a betting sponsor presumably because betting can be harmful. The same folk who probably have skin tight clothing due to weight gain, little activity and who drink lager and smoke tabs after work. When did we gain such a puritan support base

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Caractacus Potts
13 minutes ago, Harry Kinnear said:

Club getting a wee bit abuse on twitter for having a gambling sponsor. No issue for me, take the cash where we can get it. 

I get why people don’t like it but it’s not an issue for me either. Gambling adverts are everywhere and if the league was sponsored by a gambling company, as it has been in the past, then it would already be on our strips. 

Drinks companies bring up the same ethical dilemma and the Budweiser Budvar sponsor was the best we’ve had in a long time(and won the league twice with it). I had no issue with that either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Caractacus Potts said:

I get why people don’t like it but it’s not an issue for me either. Gambling adverts are everywhere and if the league was sponsored by a gambling company, as it has been in the past, then it would already be on our strips. 

Drinks companies bring up the same ethical dilemma and the Budweiser Budvar sponsor was the best we’ve had in a long time(and won the league twice with it). I had no issue with that either. 

I drink too much but it’s down to me, if we had an alcohol sponsor I wouldn’t make a fuss about it as it’s my choice. I know the harm I’m doing to myself.

Edited by Harry Kinnear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...