BFTD Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 Considering Boris literally vetted future wives by having them nosh him off at work, I guess we know what the dealbreaker was for Dorries. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonD Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 1 hour ago, BTFD said: Considering Boris literally vetted future wives by having them nosh him off at work, It wouldn't have been so bad if he hadn't done it during PM's Question Time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 3 hours ago, BTFD said: Considering Boris literally vetted future wives by having them nosh him off at work, I guess we know what the dealbreaker was for Dorries. I find it hard to believe he didn’t insist Fabricant join the queue. It would seem to be the closest the narcissistic fat w****r could get to sucking himself off. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy FFC Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 7 hours ago, djchapsticks said: https://twitter.com/Ian_Fraser/status/1668024002328117248?t=TYD8-hmmzayijn46maguqA&s=19 Nice gig if you can get it. A life peerage before 30 with no work experience at all other than 'parliamentary assistant' She is clearly his daughter. The absolute spitting image. These fuckers just coast through life with no real accountability or actual repercussions. I've always been a bit easy-osey about if the HoL should be kept or consigned to history, but this and the other crap around Johnson's honours list now makes me think the whole lot should be abolished. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 14 minutes ago, Soapy FFC said: I've always been a bit easy-osey about if the HoL should be kept or consigned to history, but this and the other crap around Johnson's honours list now makes me think the whole lot should be abolished. Don’t worry, Labour will do it the minute they gain power. Or, you know, they’ll think about maybe actually discussing it … in another hundred years. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 59 minutes ago, Soapy FFC said: I've always been a bit easy-osey about if the HoL should be kept or consigned to history, but this and the other crap around Johnson's honours list now makes me think the whole lot should be abolished. The honours list got me looking up who is actually in the HoL. They mostly seem to be ex politicians or their aides with a random smattering of business people (ownership class), journalists, artsy types, and Ian Botham. I only got as far as C before i got bored. One business guy apparently runs a private equity firm, with £20m invested - about the smallest PE firm i've ever heard of. On further inspection, it's the biggest investor in Samantha Cameron's company. I'm sure that's not why her husband appointed him though. I'd like to see a breakdown of the members by their area of expertise. I'm willing to bet that lawyers outnumber scientists, bankers and other financial engineers outnumber social scientists and actual engineers, and parasitic hangers on outnumber useful humans. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/LLN-2021-0002/LLN-2021-0002.pdf https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_House_of_Lords 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 Of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 33% said they would not want Johnson to return as an MP, 49% said they would. What the f**k is wrong with these people? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Granny Danger said: Of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 33% said they would not want Johnson to return as an MP, 49% said they would. What the f**k is wrong with these people? Red wall voters: He was stiched up by them posh ones. He’s a man of the people what you could ave a pint with - got Brexit done. Old dears in the shires: Doesn’t he speak well? What a terribly well-educated man. It really is too bad that that Sunak fellow stabbed him in the back. [sotto voce] But what better could one expect from someone that colour - we’ve given their kind far too much leeway and it really would be ripping to be voting for one of our own again. Edited June 12, 2023 by Antlion 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10menwent2mow Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 1 hour ago, Granny Danger said: Of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 33% said they would not want Johnson to return as an MP, 49% said they would. What the f**k is wrong with these people? Bowdenbow ha ha ha bolid did bow. Ha ha. Look at me. I'm Boris. Ha ha, I've never done anything wrong and I'm such a stand up bloke. Come for a pint with me. I'll prove it. Its the same grift with farage. These mutants believe it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trogdor Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 4 hours ago, Granny Danger said: Of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 33% said they would not want Johnson to return as an MP, 49% said they would. What the f**k is wrong with these people? I despair... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartsOfficialMoaner Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 11 hours ago, Granny Danger said: Of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 33% said they would not want Johnson to return as an MP, 49% said they would. What the f**k is wrong with these people? Half the 33% were telling lies and they definitely would. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 12 hours ago, Granny Danger said: Of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 33% said they would not want Johnson to return as an MP, 49% said they would. What the f**k is wrong with these people? Tbf, its not exclusive to voting specifcally for Johnson or saying you would like him back. This is what it is to vote Conservative. Doesn't matter which one. You know you are voting for despicable people and worse policy but you do it anyway. All you are seeing in that poll is a split of people who want to keep the quiet part quiet, and those willing to say it out loud. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 It's the same scenario with Trump but on a bit less extreme of a scale (currently at least). Doesn't matter what he does. He could slaughter a bag of kittens and tell his voters why the kittens deserved it and a large percentage would unquestioningly agree with him. The cult of personality hides the lack of actual ability. There would be no such thing as Trump or Johnson going 'too far' in the eyes of many people. One thing I could never really get my head around was the rise of Nazi Germany in making its people complicit in some horrendous things. Always struggled to understand why a population seemingly just went along with really, really sinister stuff and when you see these hardened right wing supporters, a lot of whom feel the Tories and Republicans arent currently hardline enough, then yeah, I can see how and why it happened. I still can't get my head around the rationale of these people but it's quite scary to see the world seemingly trundling down this path. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 13 hours ago, Granny Danger said: Of those who voted Conservative in 2019, 33% said they would not want Johnson to return as an MP, 49% said they would. What the f**k is wrong with these people? The answer is in your first sentence 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 On 12/06/2023 at 11:59, BTFD said: Considering Boris literally vetted future wives by having them nosh him off at work, I guess we know what the dealbreaker was for Dorries. I'm rather looking forward to Dorries realising that Johnson was lying to her about putting her forward for a peerage. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrshireTon Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 3 hours ago, sparky88 said: I'm rather looking forward to Dorries realising that Johnson was lying to her about putting her forward for a peerage. She's rattled and blaming Sunak now - and "sinister forces". https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65888166 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanton Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 11 minutes ago, AyrshireTon said: She's rattled and blaming Sunak now - and "sinister forces". https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65888166 Looks like She’s been on the Gin again 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy FFC Posted June 14, 2023 Share Posted June 14, 2023 In terms of causing trouble for Sunak, Nads is playing a blinder at the moment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted June 14, 2023 Share Posted June 14, 2023 22 hours ago, AyrshireTon said: She's rattled and blaming Sunak now - and "sinister forces". https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65888166 Is it Mhairi Black? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted June 14, 2023 Share Posted June 14, 2023 https://twitter.com/NadineDorries/status/1669060242552811520?t=xFqwHPBzDtcW2FQFisrA9g&s=19 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.